The gripping legal drama Criminal Justice Season 4 is set to conclude with its highly anticipated final episode, leaving fans on the edge of their seats. Headlined by the powerhouse performer Pankaj Tripathi, this season has delivered intense courtroom battles, psychological twists, and a web of deceit. With a stellar ensemble cast including Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub, Surveen Chawla, Asha Negi, and Khushboo Atre, the show has kept audiences hooked with its dark, suspenseful narrative.

If you’ve been eagerly waiting for Criminal Justice Season 4 Episode 8, here’s everything you need to know—where to watch, what to expect, and shocking spoilers that will leave you stunned!

Criminal Justice Season 4 Final Episode OTT Release Date & Platform

The final episode (Episode 8) of Criminal Justice Season 4 is now streaming exclusively on Disney+ Hotstar (JioCinema in some regions). Fans can catch the explosive conclusion to this legal thriller in Hindi with subtitles available in multiple languages.

Criminal Justice Season 4 Finale: What to Expect? (Major Spoilers Ahead!)

The climactic episode is set to unravel the truth behind Roshni’s murder, with the mysterious medicine bottle playing a pivotal role. The season revolves around Dr. Raj Nagpal (Pankaj Tripathi), accused of murdering his girlfriend Roshni, a nurse at his hospital. However, as the case unfolds, shocking revelations emerge involving Raj’s ex-wife Anju (Surveen Chawla) and their daughter Ira, who suffers from Asperger’s syndrome.

Key Twists & Fan Theories:

• Roshni’s Poisoning Plot: Recent episodes suggest Roshni was secretly poisoning Ira’s milk, possibly as revenge for being forced to abort Raj’s child or to manipulate the family dynamics.
• Anju’s Hidden Motive: Suspicion falls on Anju, who may have killed Roshni to protect Ira. Her questionable actions—like feeding Ira regular milk despite her lactose intolerance—hint at a deeper scheme.
• A Mother’s Sacrifice? Some theories suggest Anju may have framed herself to ensure Raj’s acquittal and secure Ira’s future, making her the ultimate tragic heroine.
• The Final Revelation: The finale will expose who really killed Roshni, along with Anju’s darkest secrets, leaving viewers shocked.

Criminal Justice Series Review: What Are Critics & Fans Saying?

The Criminal Justice franchise has received mixed-to-positive reviews, with praise for its gripping narrative, strong performances (especially Pankaj Tripathi’s), and suspenseful twists. However, some critics argue that the pacing could be tighter, while others appreciate its realistic courtroom drama and psychological depth.

Produced by BBC Studios India and Applause Entertainment, the series continues to be a top choice for thriller enthusiasts, blending legal intrigue with emotional family drama.

Final Verdict: Should You Watch the Criminal Justice Season 4 Finale?

If you love crime thrillers with unpredictable twists, Criminal Justice Season 4 is a must-watch. The finale promises high-stakes drama, shocking revelations, and powerful performances that will leave a lasting impact.

Don’t miss the explosive conclusion—stream it now on Disney+ Hotstar!

Draped in deep crimson robes, his prayer beads slipping through his fingers with calm deliberation, the monk advances toward us. This is no small risk. With eight unknown men tracking our every move, even a few whispered words in public could spell trouble for him.

Yet he steps forward, undeterred. “Life here is harsh for us,” he murmurs with resolve.

For decades, this monastery—perched in southwestern Sichuan’s rugged terrain—has been a focal point of Tibetan resistance. The world first took notice in the late 2000s, when desperate monks resorted to self-immolation in protest of Chinese rule. Now, almost twenty years later, Kirti Monastery remains a concern for authorities in Beijing.

A police station has been constructed at the temple’s gate, standing guard over a shadowy chamber lined with prayer wheels that squeak as they turn. Surveillance cameras perch on heavy steel poles, their lenses sweeping every corner of the compound.

“They don’t mean well; anyone can see it,” the monk adds, a hush of caution in his tone. “Be careful—people are watching us.”

At that moment, the men tailing us quicken their pace. The monk calmly turns away, merging into the silent sanctuary.

For nearly 75 years, Tibet has been under the rule of the Communist Party of China. Since annexing the region in 1950, Beijing has poured infrastructure investments—roads, railways, and tourist facilities—into the area. Though meant to integrate Tibet economically, these developments brought with them a larger troop presence and a surge of government officials, eroding Tibetan religious traditions and personal freedoms.

Beijing insists on Tibet’s inseparability from China. It branded the Dalai Lama a separatist and has criminalized public displays of loyalty to him.

Yet, in places like Aba (Ngaba in Tibetan), where Kirti Monastery stands, resistance has taken dramatic forms. In 2008, a monk stepped forward during a protest holding a photo of the Dalai Lama—an act that escalated into a violent crackdown. Chinese forces opened fire, leaving at least 18 dead, according to official figures. Exile communities claim the toll may be closer to 200.

The years that followed saw more than 150 self-immolations—most clustered around Aba—each act a desperate plea for the Dalai Lama’s return. The main street was grimly dubbed “Martyr’s Row.”

Since then, Beijing’s grip has tightened. Access to reliable information in Tibet is now nearly impossible. Most accounts emerge from exiles or the Dharamshala-based Tibetan government-in-exile.

We returned before dawn the next morning, slipping past our escorts and hiking to Aba in time for early prayers. Inside the prayer hall, monks in yellow Gelug hats intoned solemn chants amid drifting incense smoke. About thirty local men and women, clad in traditional Tibetan robes, sat cross-legged until the bell announced the end of the service.

“This government has poisoned the air in Tibet,” one monk confided. “They do not serve the people—they oppress us, depriving us of basic human rights.”

Our conversation remained short to avoid drawing attention. Still, it was rare to hear such candid criticism.

This week, the issue of Tibet’s future deepened as the Dalai Lama celebrated his 90th birthday in Dharamshala, India. Among his followers, relief, uncertainty, and concern mingled over his announcement that his successor would only be identified after his death. In Tibet, however, even mentioning his name is taboo.

Beijing has unequivocally stated that the next Dalai Lama must be selected within China and ratified by the Communist Party. Tibetans within the homeland, cut off from external information, have remained silent.

“That’s just how it is,” the monk told us. “That’s the reality.”

Two Worlds Under One Sky 🌄

The road to Aba winds some 500 km (300 mi) from Chengdu, snaking through snow-capped peaks and vast grasslands before reaching the edge of the Himalayan plateau. Buddhist temples, gilded and shining, dot the landscape, their rooftops catching the sun at each bend. Here, motor traffic often yields to yak herders on horseback, guiding stoic cattle as eagles hover overhead.

It’s a place of striking contrasts: ancestral Tibetan culture and religious devotion set against the steady advance of Beijing’s infrastructure and surveillance networks. Officially, Tibetans are allowed to practice Buddhism—but their spirituality also fosters a distinct cultural identity that Beijing views with suspicion.

Human rights groups report that Tibetans are being imprisoned for peaceful demonstration, speaking their language, or simply possessing a portrait of the Dalai Lama. Meanwhile, new educational directives force ethnic children into Mandarin-speaking schools and restrict monastery teachings until age 18—requiring them to “love the country and religion” and adhere to national laws.

A local monk, under an umbrella in the drizzle, recounted the painful loss of a monastery-school demolished months ago. “It was a preaching school,” he said, voice breaking with emotion.

Such policies echo a 2021 decree mandating Mandarin instruction in Tibetan preschools and primary schools. Beijing defends the measure as giving Tibetan youth better employment prospects—but Tibetan scholars like Robert Barnett warn it threatens the survival of Tibetan Buddhism and language. He describes a future where education consists solely of Chinese culture, holidays, and values, while Tibetan thought is tightly controlled.

Despite rapid development—high-speed trains, tourist hotels, cafes—the Tibetan heart remains under pressure. Tourists, clad in branded outdoor gear, take in the spectacle of locals prostrating at temple doors. Prayer wheels turn, rich murals attract awe—but so does the omnipresent surveillance: facial-recognition check-ins at hotels, endless ID requirements captured on hi-def cameras, and tightly controlled media access.

Barnett characterizes the region as sealed off, “locked from the outside world.”

The Question of Succession

News of the Dalai Lama’s succession plan was broadcast globally, but censored locally. Since 2011, the Dalai Lama has relinquished political power to a democratically elected Tibetan leadership. Talks with Beijing regarding a successor have reportedly taken place this year but remain shrouded in secrecy.

The Dalai Lama has previously hinted his next incarnation might be born “in the free world,” outside China’s realm, and emphasized that “no one else has any authority to interfere.”

Beijing, however, insists the selection must follow Chinese religious regulations and national law. Even before confirmation, Chinese officials are preparing the ground—organizing propaganda and indoctrinating communities about new succession policies. According to Barnett, this is a deliberate effort to groom a controlled, loyal candidate.

Public trust hangs in the balance: memories of the Panchen Lama controversy linger. In 1995, the exiled Dalai Lama identified a young Panchen Lama, who then disappeared. Beijing later installed its own Panchen Lama—accepted by state structures but rejected by many Tibetans in exile.

If a dual Dalai Lama emerges—one endorsed by Beijing, the other by the exiled Tibetan community—the world will face its own seminal choice. And for Tibetans within China, many may never even hear whispers of this divergence.

Barnett says the Party’s aim is clear: “They want to turn the lion of Tibetan culture into a poodle,” transforming a vibrant spiritual identity into a domesticated, patriotic version devoid of dissent.

As we departed, a line of local women entered the prayer wheel chamber, their baskets full of tools for building or farming. They spun the wheels, singing softly in Tibetan, their gray-streaked hair visible under sunhats.

For 75 years they have clung to their heritage—holding fast through protest, persecution, and profound loss. And still, they persist.

South Africa have announced their playing XI for the first Test against Zimbabwe, handing international debuts to exciting young talents Dewald Brevis, Codi Yusuf, and wicketkeeper-batter Lhuan-dre Pretorius. The selection signals a new era for the Proteas, as they rest key players like Kagiso Rabada, Aiden Markram, Marco Jansen, and Tristan Stubbs for the series. With several senior stars absent, this match presents a golden opportunity for the newcomers to make an immediate impact on the international stage.

Meanwhile, Zimbabwe, led by experienced skipper Craig Ervine, will be eager to turn around their poor record against their southern African neighbors. The hosts have struggled in recent encounters, losing eight of their last nine Tests against South Africa. This match marks Zimbabwe’s first Test against the Proteas since December 2017, adding extra significance to the contest.

The Zimbabwean squad features a mix of seasoned campaigners and fresh talent, including all-rounder Sean Williams, pace spearhead Blessing Muzarabani, and rising stars like Brian Bennett and Clive Madande. However, they face an uphill battle against a South African side that, despite fielding a relatively inexperienced lineup, boasts depth and quality.

Squads:
Zimbabwe: Craig Ervine (c), Brian Bennett, Sean Williams, Nick Welch, Takudzwanashe Kaitano, Clive Madande (wk), Wessly Madhevere, Vincent Masekesa, Blessing Muzarabani, Tanaka Chivanga, Trevor Gwandu, Tafadzwa Tsiga, Newman Nyamhuri, Wellington Masakadza, Kundai Matigimu, Prince Masvaure.

South Africa: (Playing XI) – Dewald Brevis, Codi Yusuf, Lhuan-dre Pretorius (wk), Tony de Zorzi, Keegan Petersen, Ryan Rickelton, Wiaan Mulder, Keshav Maharaj (c), Gerald Coetzee, Lungi Ngidi, Nandre Burger.

With South Africa testing their bench strength and Zimbabwe desperate to rewrite history, this Test promises to be an intriguing battle between two sides at different stages of their cricketing journey. The match could also serve as a platform for emerging stars to announce themselves on the big stage